Appeals and Post Conviction Cases
Since beginning his career as a judicial law clerk at the Oregon Supreme Court, Jason Thompson has represented hundreds of individuals before the Oregon appellate courts.
On direct appeal, Mr. Thompson has represented the prevailing parties in:
- State v. Mendoza-Lopez, 291 Or App 292 (2018)
- State v. Malm, 287 Or App 201 (2017)
- Mellerio v. Nooth, 279 Or App 419 (2016)
- State v. Gostevskyh, 256 Or App 472 (2013)
- State v. Akim, 256 Or App 352 (2013)
- State v. Wood, 253 Or App 97 (2012)
- State v. Reeves, 250 Or App 294 (2012)
- State v. Groom, 249 Or App 118 (2012)
- State v. Miller, 238 Or App 338 (2010)
- State v. Vargas-Torres, 237 Or App 619 (2010)
- State v. Hylton, 210 Or App 104 (2006)
- State v. Litscher, 207 Or App 565 (2006)
- State v. Garza, 201 Or App 527 (2005)
- State v. Roller, 201 Or App 166 (2005)
- State v. Page, 197 Or App 72 (2005)
In most of those cases, Mr. Thompson represented individuals previously convicted of Ballot Measure 11 offenses. Typically, on direct appeal, he challenges prior rulings by the trial judge. In post-conviction cases, typically, he challenges decisions made by prior counsel for the convicted individual. The goal is the same with both an appeal and post-conviction - to reverse the prior conviction.
Deadlines and procedural impediments are always a primary concern for Mr. Thompson on any appeal or post-conviction case. Contact Thompson Law, immediately to schedule a consultation to pursue and preserve all avenues available to challenge a prior conviction. Often times, Mr. Thompson will be hired to pursue an appeal even before the individual has been sentenced at the trial court level, as well as hired to begin working on a post-conviction case before the individual’s direct appeal has concluded.